Teachers’ conceptions of active methodologies in science teaching in Bom Jesus – GO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33837/msj.v8i1.1667Keywords:
active methodology, science teaching, teachers, continuing educationAbstract
Active methodologies are a powerful tool in science education, promoting student-centered learning where students become the protagonists in constructing their own knowledge by connecting curricular content with real-life situations. In Brazil, discussions about active methodologies became more prominent in the 1990s and intensified in the early 2000s, partially overlapping with the initial training of many practicing teachers. Given this context, this study aimed not only to identify the understanding of 16 teachers from municipal and state public schools in Bom Jesus, GO, regarding active methodologies but also to assess the actual need for continuing education. The research considered potential gaps in teacher training, particularly for science and chemistry education. Using a mixed-methods approach with a questionnaire as the data collection tool, the results revealed that some teachers are unfamiliar with active methodologies or face difficulties applying them. This finding highlights a clear need for professional development focused on both understanding and implementing these methods. The study concludes that teacher training must be connected to the historical context of their initial education. As such, a crucial pedagogical intervention is to provide continuing education for these teachers on the use of active methodologies.
References
Arão, M. S. R., Silva, A. M. F. S., & Lima, I. A. (2018, October 17). Active methodology in the teaching-learning process in the early years of elementary education. In Proceedings of the 5th National Congress on Education (CONEDU), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. Realize Publisher.
https://editorarealize.com.br/artigo/visualizar/46031
Assis, L. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Halmenschlager, K. R. (2013). Approaching social issues in chemistry teaching: Teachers’ understandings [Undergraduate thesis, Federal University of Pampa– Caçapava do Sul Campus].
http://cursos.unipampa.edu.br/cursos/cienciasexatas/files/2014/06/Lisiane-Morais-de-Assis1.pdf
Backes, N. F., & Prochnow, T. R. (2019, November 10). Teaching organic chemistry through theme-based discussions: The use of the World Café active methodology. In EDEQ, Rio Grande.
https://edeq.furg.br/images/arquivos/trabalhoscompletos/s02/ficha-213.pdf
Bardin, L. (2011). Content analysis. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Bartolomeu, T. F., Silva, H. Z. S., & Lozza, S. L. (2016). Active methodologies: A path to innovate pedagogical practices. Scientific Initiation Support Program (PAIC) 2016–2017.
Bender, W. N. (2014). Project-based learning: Differentiated education for the 21st century (F. de S. Rodrigues, Trans.). Porto Alegre: Penso.
Berbel, N. A. N. (2011). Active methodologies and the promotion of students’ autonomy. Semina: Social and Human Sciences, 32(1), 25–40.
https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0383.2011v32n1p25
Bernardelli, M. S. (2004). Enchanting to teach – An alternative approach for teaching chemistry. In Brazil–Latin America Convention, Brazilian Congress and Paraná Meeting of Body Psychotherapies, Foz do Iguaçu. Reichian Center.
http://www.centroreichiano.com.br/artigos/Anais-2004/BERNARDELLI-Marlize-Spagolla-Encantar.pdf
Bonadiman, H., & Nonenmacher, S. E. B. (2007). Enjoying and learning in physics teaching: A methodological proposal. Brazilian Journal of Physics Teaching, 24(2), 194–223.
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/1087
Brazil. Ministry of Education. (2002). PCN+: Complementary educational guidelines to the National Curriculum Parameters – Natural Sciences, Mathematics, and their Technologies. Brasília: MEC.
https://dominiopublico.mec.gov.br/download/texto/me001942.pdf
Brazil. Ministry of Education, Department of Basic Education. (2006). Curricular guidelines for secondary education: Natural sciences, mathematics, and their technologies. Brasília: MEC.
http://www.cespe.unb.br/vestibular/1vest2010/guiadovestibulando/book_volume_03_internet.pdf
Bruini, E. C. (2021). Education in Brazil. Brazil School.
http://brasilescola.uol.com.br/educacao/educacao-no-brasil.htm
Camas, N. P., & Brito, G. S. (2017). Active methodologies: A discussion on practical possibilities in continuing education for higher education teachers. Dialogues in Education Review, 17(52).
https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.17.052.DS01
Castoldi, R., & Polinarski, C. A. (2006). The use of didactic-pedagogical resources in motivating learning. In II National Symposium on Science and Technology Teaching, Ponta Grossa, PR.
Coelho, L., & Pisoni, S. (2012). Vygotsky: His theory and its influence on education. E-Ped Journal – FACOS/CNEC Osório, 2(1).
Delizoicov, D., Angotti, J. A., & Pernambuco, M. M. (2009). Science teaching: Fundamentals and methods (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.
Diesel, A., Baldez, A. L. S., & Martins, S. N. (2017). The principles of active teaching methodologies: A theoretical approach. Thema Journal, 14(1), 268–288.
https://doi.org/10.15536/thema.14.2017.268-288.404
Fernandes, J. D., Ferreira, S. L., Torre, M. P. S. L., Rosa, D. O. S., & Costa, H. O. G. (2003). Strategies for implementing a new pedagogical proposal in the School of Nursing at the Federal University of Bahia. Brazilian Nursing Journal, 56(4), 392–395.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672003000400017
Freire, P. (2011). Pedagogy of autonomy: Necessary knowledge for educational practice (43rd ed.). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Gibbs, G. (2009). Qualitative data analysis. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Gomes, C. M. A., & Boruchovitch, E. (2008). Motivation as indiscipline prevention. Education in Review, 32, p. 199-213.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40602008000200014
Grahan, A. (2010). How to write and use case studies for teaching and learning in the public sector. Brasília: ENAP – National School of Public Administration.
https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/515/1/estudos_de_caso.pdf
Libâneo, J. C. (2004). Organization and management of the school – Theory and practice. Goiânia: Alternativa.
Libâneo, J. C. (2013). Didactics (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.
Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (1999). Research techniques (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Moran, J. (2007). The education we desire: New challenges and how to achieve them (2nd ed.). Campinas, SP: Papirus.
Moran, J. (2018). Active methodologies for deep learning. In J. Moran & L. Bacich (Eds.), Active methodologies for innovative education: A theoretical-practical approach (pp. 15–35). Porto Alegre: Penso.
Oliveira, D. A., Gonçalves, G. B. B., Melo, S. D., Fardin, D., & Mill, V. (2012). Transformations in the organization of teachers’ work processes and their consequences for educators. Work & Education, 11, 51–65.
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/trabedu/article/view/8991
Otto, P. A. (2016). The importance of using technology in classrooms in the early years of elementary education I (Undergraduate thesis, Federal). University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis - SC.
https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/168858/TCC_otto.pdf?sequence=
Pappis, T. H. B., Magalhães, C. R., & Costa, M. R. (2024). Contributions of a teacher training program in active methodologies and self-regulated learning: Weaving actions and reflections in health education. CADPED, 21(13).
https://doi.org/10.54033/cadpedv21n13-263
Pereira, F. I. (2017). Peer learning and the challenges of education for critical thinking. UNISUAM Journal, 2(1), 6–12.
https://doi.org/10.15202/2526-2254.2017v2n1p6
Pinto, A. S. S., et al. (2012). Didactic innovation – Project of reflection and application of active learning methodologies in higher education: An experience with peer instruction. Janus Journal, 9(5), 75–87. São Paulo.
http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&pid=S1414-4077202100030071800059&lng=en
Ramos, L. S., Antunes, F., & Silva, L. H. A. (2010). Science teachers’ conceptions about science teaching. SBEn Bio Journal, 3, 1666–1674.
https://www.sbenbio.org.br/publicacoes/anais/III_Enebio/B056.pdf
Ribeiro, E. (2008a). The interview perspective in qualitative research. In Evidence: Perspectives and Research in Educational Knowledge, 4, 129–148.
https://www.uniaraxa.edu.br/ojs/index.php/evidencia/article/view/328/310
Ribeiro, L. R. C. (2008b). Problem-based learning. São Carlos: Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar) / Institutional Support Foundation.
https://doi.org/10.7476/9788576002970
Rudio, F. V. (2002). Introduction to scientific research design. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Schneiders, L. A. (2018). The flipped classroom method (Vol. 99). Lajeado: Univates Publishing. (Active Learning Methodologies Series).
Souza, A. L. A., Vilaça, A. L. A., & Teixeira, H. J. B. (2020). The benefits of active learning methodology in education. In G. M. C. Costa (Ed.), Active methodologies: Methods and practices for the 21st century (p. 642). Quirinópolis, GO: IGM Publishing.
https://www.recursosdefisica.com.br/files/Metodologias-Ativas-metodos-e-praticas.pdf
Valente, V. A., Almeida, M. E. B., & Geraldini, A. F. S. (2017). Active methodologies: From conceptions to practices at different educational levels. Dialogues in Education Review, 17(52), 455–478.
https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416x.17.052.ds07
Valente, J. A. (2014). Blended learning and changes in higher education: The flipped classroom approach. Educar em Revista, 30(4), 79-97.
https://doi.org/110.1590/0104-4060.38645
Vigotskii, L. S., Luria, A. R., & Leontiev, A. N. (1988). Language, development and learning. São Paulo: Ícone/EDUSP.
Wartha, E. J., Silva, E. L., & Bejarano, N. R. R. (2013). Everyday life and contextualization in chemistry teaching. New Chemistry at School, 35(2), 84–91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1969 Tatiana Aparecida Rosa da Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) The Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work.