Teachers’ conceptions of active methodologies in science teaching in Bom Jesus – GO

Authors

  • Maria Aparecida da Costa Instituto Federal de Ciência e Tecnologia de Goiás, Campus Itumbiara
  • Tatiana Aparecida Rosa Silva Instituto Federal de Ciência e Tecnologia de Goiás, Campus Itumbiara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33837/msj.v8i1.1667

Keywords:

active methodology, science teaching, teachers, continuing education

Abstract

Active methodologies are a powerful tool in science education, promoting student-centered learning where students become the protagonists in constructing their own knowledge by connecting curricular content with real-life situations. In Brazil, discussions about active methodologies became more prominent in the 1990s and intensified in the early 2000s, partially overlapping with the initial training of many practicing teachers. Given this context, this study aimed not only to identify the understanding of 16 teachers from municipal and state public schools in Bom Jesus, GO, regarding active methodologies but also to assess the actual need for continuing education. The research considered potential gaps in teacher training, particularly for science and chemistry education. Using a mixed-methods approach with a questionnaire as the data collection tool, the results revealed that some teachers are unfamiliar with active methodologies or face difficulties applying them. This finding highlights a clear need for professional development focused on both understanding and implementing these methods. The study concludes that teacher training must be connected to the historical context of their initial education. As such, a crucial pedagogical intervention is to provide continuing education for these teachers on the use of active methodologies.

References

Arão, M. S. R., Silva, A. M. F. S., & Lima, I. A. (2018, October 17). Active methodology in the teaching-learning process in the early years of elementary education. In Proceedings of the 5th National Congress on Education (CONEDU), João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. Realize Publisher.

https://editorarealize.com.br/artigo/visualizar/46031

Assis, L. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Halmenschlager, K. R. (2013). Approaching social issues in chemistry teaching: Teachers’ understandings [Undergraduate thesis, Federal University of Pampa– Caçapava do Sul Campus].

http://cursos.unipampa.edu.br/cursos/cienciasexatas/files/2014/06/Lisiane-Morais-de-Assis1.pdf

Backes, N. F., & Prochnow, T. R. (2019, November 10). Teaching organic chemistry through theme-based discussions: The use of the World Café active methodology. In EDEQ, Rio Grande.

https://edeq.furg.br/images/arquivos/trabalhoscompletos/s02/ficha-213.pdf

Bardin, L. (2011). Content analysis. São Paulo: Edições 70.

Bartolomeu, T. F., Silva, H. Z. S., & Lozza, S. L. (2016). Active methodologies: A path to innovate pedagogical practices. Scientific Initiation Support Program (PAIC) 2016–2017.

https://cadernopaic.fae.edu

Bender, W. N. (2014). Project-based learning: Differentiated education for the 21st century (F. de S. Rodrigues, Trans.). Porto Alegre: Penso.

Berbel, N. A. N. (2011). Active methodologies and the promotion of students’ autonomy. Semina: Social and Human Sciences, 32(1), 25–40.

https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0383.2011v32n1p25

Bernardelli, M. S. (2004). Enchanting to teach – An alternative approach for teaching chemistry. In Brazil–Latin America Convention, Brazilian Congress and Paraná Meeting of Body Psychotherapies, Foz do Iguaçu. Reichian Center.

http://www.centroreichiano.com.br/artigos/Anais-2004/BERNARDELLI-Marlize-Spagolla-Encantar.pdf

Bonadiman, H., & Nonenmacher, S. E. B. (2007). Enjoying and learning in physics teaching: A methodological proposal. Brazilian Journal of Physics Teaching, 24(2), 194–223.

https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/1087

Brazil. Ministry of Education. (2002). PCN+: Complementary educational guidelines to the National Curriculum Parameters – Natural Sciences, Mathematics, and their Technologies. Brasília: MEC.

https://dominiopublico.mec.gov.br/download/texto/me001942.pdf

Brazil. Ministry of Education, Department of Basic Education. (2006). Curricular guidelines for secondary education: Natural sciences, mathematics, and their technologies. Brasília: MEC.

http://www.cespe.unb.br/vestibular/1vest2010/guiadovestibulando/book_volume_03_internet.pdf

Bruini, E. C. (2021). Education in Brazil. Brazil School.

http://brasilescola.uol.com.br/educacao/educacao-no-brasil.htm

Camas, N. P., & Brito, G. S. (2017). Active methodologies: A discussion on practical possibilities in continuing education for higher education teachers. Dialogues in Education Review, 17(52).

https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.17.052.DS01

Castoldi, R., & Polinarski, C. A. (2006). The use of didactic-pedagogical resources in motivating learning. In II National Symposium on Science and Technology Teaching, Ponta Grossa, PR.

https://atividadeparaeducacaoespecial.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/recursos-didatico-pedag%C3%B3gicos.pdf

Coelho, L., & Pisoni, S. (2012). Vygotsky: His theory and its influence on education. E-Ped Journal – FACOS/CNEC Osório, 2(1).

https://doceru.com/doc/cn00v0

Delizoicov, D., Angotti, J. A., & Pernambuco, M. M. (2009). Science teaching: Fundamentals and methods (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.

Diesel, A., Baldez, A. L. S., & Martins, S. N. (2017). The principles of active teaching methodologies: A theoretical approach. Thema Journal, 14(1), 268–288.

https://doi.org/10.15536/thema.14.2017.268-288.404

Fernandes, J. D., Ferreira, S. L., Torre, M. P. S. L., Rosa, D. O. S., & Costa, H. O. G. (2003). Strategies for implementing a new pedagogical proposal in the School of Nursing at the Federal University of Bahia. Brazilian Nursing Journal, 56(4), 392–395.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71672003000400017

Freire, P. (2011). Pedagogy of autonomy: Necessary knowledge for educational practice (43rd ed.). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

Gibbs, G. (2009). Qualitative data analysis. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Gomes, C. M. A., & Boruchovitch, E. (2008). Motivation as indiscipline prevention. Education in Review, 32, p. 199-213.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40602008000200014

Grahan, A. (2010). How to write and use case studies for teaching and learning in the public sector. Brasília: ENAP – National School of Public Administration.

https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/515/1/estudos_de_caso.pdf

Libâneo, J. C. (2004). Organization and management of the school – Theory and practice. Goiânia: Alternativa.

Libâneo, J. C. (2013). Didactics (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.

Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (1999). Research techniques (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Moran, J. (2007). The education we desire: New challenges and how to achieve them (2nd ed.). Campinas, SP: Papirus.

Moran, J. (2018). Active methodologies for deep learning. In J. Moran & L. Bacich (Eds.), Active methodologies for innovative education: A theoretical-practical approach (pp. 15–35). Porto Alegre: Penso.

Oliveira, D. A., Gonçalves, G. B. B., Melo, S. D., Fardin, D., & Mill, V. (2012). Transformations in the organization of teachers’ work processes and their consequences for educators. Work & Education, 11, 51–65.

https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/trabedu/article/view/8991

Otto, P. A. (2016). The importance of using technology in classrooms in the early years of elementary education I (Undergraduate thesis, Federal). University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis - SC.

https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/168858/TCC_otto.pdf?sequence=

Pappis, T. H. B., Magalhães, C. R., & Costa, M. R. (2024). Contributions of a teacher training program in active methodologies and self-regulated learning: Weaving actions and reflections in health education. CADPED, 21(13).

https://doi.org/10.54033/cadpedv21n13-263

Pereira, F. I. (2017). Peer learning and the challenges of education for critical thinking. UNISUAM Journal, 2(1), 6–12.

https://doi.org/10.15202/2526-2254.2017v2n1p6

Pinto, A. S. S., et al. (2012). Didactic innovation – Project of reflection and application of active learning methodologies in higher education: An experience with peer instruction. Janus Journal, 9(5), 75–87. São Paulo.

http://educa.fcc.org.br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&pid=S1414-4077202100030071800059&lng=en

Ramos, L. S., Antunes, F., & Silva, L. H. A. (2010). Science teachers’ conceptions about science teaching. SBEn Bio Journal, 3, 1666–1674.

https://www.sbenbio.org.br/publicacoes/anais/III_Enebio/B056.pdf

Ribeiro, E. (2008a). The interview perspective in qualitative research. In Evidence: Perspectives and Research in Educational Knowledge, 4, 129–148.

https://www.uniaraxa.edu.br/ojs/index.php/evidencia/article/view/328/310

Ribeiro, L. R. C. (2008b). Problem-based learning. São Carlos: Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar) / Institutional Support Foundation.

https://doi.org/10.7476/9788576002970

Rudio, F. V. (2002). Introduction to scientific research design. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Schneiders, L. A. (2018). The flipped classroom method (Vol. 99). Lajeado: Univates Publishing. (Active Learning Methodologies Series).

https://cursosextensao.usp.br/pluginfile.php/771576/mod_resource/content/4/O%20m%C3%A9todo%20da%20Sala%20de%20Aula%20Invertida%20.pdf

Souza, A. L. A., Vilaça, A. L. A., & Teixeira, H. J. B. (2020). The benefits of active learning methodology in education. In G. M. C. Costa (Ed.), Active methodologies: Methods and practices for the 21st century (p. 642). Quirinópolis, GO: IGM Publishing.

https://www.recursosdefisica.com.br/files/Metodologias-Ativas-metodos-e-praticas.pdf

Valente, V. A., Almeida, M. E. B., & Geraldini, A. F. S. (2017). Active methodologies: From conceptions to practices at different educational levels. Dialogues in Education Review, 17(52), 455–478.

https://doi.org/10.7213/1981-416x.17.052.ds07

Valente, J. A. (2014). Blended learning and changes in higher education: The flipped classroom approach. Educar em Revista, 30(4), 79-97.

https://doi.org/110.1590/0104-4060.38645

Vigotskii, L. S., Luria, A. R., & Leontiev, A. N. (1988). Language, development and learning. São Paulo: Ícone/EDUSP.

Wartha, E. J., Silva, E. L., & Bejarano, N. R. R. (2013). Everyday life and contextualization in chemistry teaching. New Chemistry at School, 35(2), 84–91.

https://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc35_2/04-CCD-151-12.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01

How to Cite

da Costa, M. A., & Silva, T. A. R. (2025). Teachers’ conceptions of active methodologies in science teaching in Bom Jesus – GO. Multi-Science Journal, 8(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.33837/msj.v8i1.1667

Issue

Section

Teaching & Education